The pressures of a sport for an athlete are so great that cheating becomes a way to attain opportunities to win. Many athletes have so much weighing on their shoulder from their teammates, coaches, and fans that there are times where cheating in order to win is necessary. Feigning injury, over exaggeration of a foul, using illegal tactics and plays, and the use of performance enhancing drugs. These are all, under the dictionary definition, considered acts of cheating.
Cheating in sports is a very common issue in sports today and is the centre of the research paper below. It has five primary areas: the introduction, literature review, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion. The introduction segment provides a brief history of cheating in sports and provides the current state of the issue today. The basis of the research paper is the literature review about two types of research. Andrew Bloodworth and Michael McNamee conduct a study to determine how athletes respond to doping in British sports. The next past research discusses the influence of referees in reducing the use of illicit tactics in games. The purpose of the paper is to determine the influence of mental pressure as a leading cause of cheating in exams. With sample surveys and interviews, the research uses a target sample of 40 athletes from three states in the United States of America to determine their level of mental pressure and the probability of them to cheat in sports. The results indicate that a majority of them often get tempted to cheat as a result of the pressure to perform. A brief discussion follows suit and finally the conclusion summarizes the main points of the research paper.
Cheating in sports has been occurring over the years, and those responsible have done little to stop it. The reason for this is the unrelenting desire to win every time and at all costs. As a result, sports experts have carried out important research studies to try to understand why sportsmen choose to cheat through various ways such as the use of illegal tactics, doping, faking injury, and exaggeration of a foul. According to the International Journal of Drug Policy, two experts carried out a study to determine the views regarding doping and anti-doping among British athletes to understand the extent of having clean Olympians (Bloodworth and McNamee 277).
Bloodworth and McNamee put together a sample of 40 athletes in Britain from a range of 13 dissimilar sports. The sample had an average age of 19.6 years and comprised of both genders; male and female. They divided the groups into 12 focus groups, where they questioned the candidates separately on their attitude towards doping. They incorporated the use of both qualitative and quantitative analyses to evaluate the answers given. They went ahead to transcribe the results from the focus groups and analysed the answers using a software known as QSR NVivo 8 (Bloodworth and McNamee 279). The results of the study indicate that most British athletes did not believe that doping was a national issue in sports. The study also shows that the athletes admitted wanting to take drugs to boost their performance, but only under certain conditions such as bouncing back from injury or economic pressure. Also, the research also portrayed that most of the athletes did not face any existing external pressure to consume performance-enhancing drugs (Bloodworth and McNamee 280). As such, the study concluded that as much as doping has its benefits, a majority of the athletes preferred to stay clean to avoid social shame…