Assignment #1: Making an Ethical Decision (15%)
In this assignment, students will respond to a short case study demonstrating an understanding of an ethical dilemma and the ethical theories presented in the course.
Required Elements of Assignment #1 – Making an Ethical Decision: Read critically and analyze the scenario provided; Answer the question, “What would you do?;”
To answer the question, students must identify the ethical dilemma;
Apply at least three theories to make the decision;
Compare and contrast your results using the three theories;
Choose the result that you consider to be the best resolution of the dilemma and explain why;
The process of making a decision entails selecting what is wrong, right or the most appropriate course. Ethics provides the framework that guides one’s behavior and how they ought to act when faced with different situations. In a business, making ethical decisions is essential to ensure the smooth running of activities and hence the success of the enterprise. The paper employs ethical theories on Jill’s case and generates the best solution to the dilemma.
Ethics Theories Perspective
The ethical dilemma that Jill encounters is whether to explain to the boss that she cannot be objective or take up the responsibility. Also, she is faced with the challenge of making a choice based on the personal issues that she has with Henry or derive this solely from Henry’s performance. The application of the utilitarian theory requires that Jill evaluates each action’s outcome and selects the one that maximizes the good for most people (French 176). The harm and the benefits of taking up the task in spite of her personal issue with Henry are analyzed.
The demerit of incorporating her feelings in the decision process is that she would not be objective in hiring the best person with the desirable skills. The merit is that she would operate peacefully in her role in the company. On the other hand, Jill has been active in recruiting the best people for the organization. The outstanding performance of Henry in the Miami branch highlights that he would bring the same expertise as the CEO of the company. With the corporation’s need for success, the theory would be supportive of Jill taking up the role and avoiding the inclusion of her personal issues in the decision process.
Secondly, the deontology theory bases decision morality on rules rather than the use of consequences in justifying an action. Immanuel Kant explains that the outcomes of an activity should not define what is wrong or right, but rather an event itself (Hooker 89). An act should adhere to the set rules, and this defines its rightness. A judgment is made based on whether or not one complies with the laws and undertakes their duty…